Logo 1
WELKAM
.........................................WELCOME......................................... The Central Malaita Students Association (CMSA) is a multi-dialect and cultural Student Group Consisting of students from Kwara’ae, Langalanga, Kwai and Ngongosila, Malaita Outer Islands, Kwaio and Fataleka. Our vision and objective is to protect the norms and cultural values of our members while at the same time we enhance our academic knowledge and skills towards the promotion of development and the improvement of living standards in our respective regions. .............................................DISCLAIMER............................... The site welcomes any contribution by way of information, comments, news articles, photos etc from its members and interested members of the public to ensure we are well informed of all the developments in our villages, constituencies, regions, islands, country, region and the world at large as well. However, any transmission of information, news and comments is intended only for the use of the members of the Association. Any use or dissemination of information provided in this site in other websites or medium of information is not the responsibility of the Association, and the Association cannot be held liable for it. The contents of this webpage, unless expressly stated, do not comprise the views of the Association or any representation by the Association, but are views of its individual members. .
LOCATION
m_political wards
WHAT'S NEW
  • Central Malaita Student Association(CMSA) would include Malaita Outter Islands student as of next year.That means if you are from Malaita Outter Islands, you are part of CMSA.
  • This site is currently undergoing some major changes.
NOTICES
I WILL BE AWAY FOR TWO WEEKS IN THE SOLOMONS. WHILE I AM AWAY, N.G, COULD YOU KEEP OUR SITE UPDATED WITH ALL THE LATEST NEWS FROM HOME. I WILL BE BACK ONLINE IN AUGUST - PM
QUOTE OF THE DAY
"Youth is a blunder; Manhood is a struggle; Old age is a regret - (BENJAMIN DISRAELI (1804 - 1881)"
BENJAMIN DISRAELI (1804-1881)
CHAT BOARD
KU'AL HU'AN ALA'ANGA!!!.
CLIPS OF THE TSUNAMI IN SOLOMON ISLANDS
HISTORICAL CLIPS OF THE SOLOMONS
OTHER SOLOMON ISLANDS CLIPS: MUSIC, SPORTS ETC
POSTERS

Vakavuku, SISA custom dancers administrator

Central Malaita Dancing Group at the Tsunami Appeal at Laucala Campus administrator

Auki

AUKI WHARF administrator

malakids

REACHING OUT....A young boy from Kilusakwalo reading through a pamphlet about RAMSI’s work in Solomon Islands which was distributed during a meeting by a RAMSI Outreach Team to the village yesterday. PICTURE: MOFFAT MAMU administrator

Fiji Military

A Malaita Ramo - JanesOceania.com

Fiji Military

A house found it self submerged as a result of the Tsunami - Lifhaus.com">

Jacinta Moli from Central Malaita representing Solomon Islands in Powerlifting during the Commonwealth Games administrator

/

Tennis Queen Irine George from Central Malaita" ">
Tuesday, November 20, 2007
PM SOGAVARE’S STATEMENT ON CURRENT POLITICAL SITUATION

Govt Media Services
Honiara

The recent political development, which was spearheaded by the former Minister of Finance, in a desperate attempt to cover up trails of mismanagement of public funds to satisfy his own personal ambitions and egos have caused unnecessary panic amongst our people who have started to see and benefit from the implementation of the government’s bottom up development policy.

My biggest disappointment here is that he has managed to confuse a number of government MPs to support his very selfish agenda. I must therefore call on these MPs to seriously reconsider their position with the member for Gizo/Kolombangara and former Minister of Finance.

Our people deserve better things from their members of parliament than be caught up in the selfish agenda of the former Minister of Finance. Political instability is the last thing that we would like to have after what this country has gone through during the ethnic unrest.
Every Solomon Islanders especially those in important positions of leadership have a solemn responsibility to ensure that we do not return the country to the year 2000 situation, where lawlessness and chaos reign.


Leaders should have the broader interest of the people at heart instead of living in their little world and worrying about their narrow personal interests. This is especially true for parliamentarians who are elected into parliament to advance national interests.

It is in this context that I am totally disappointed about the attitude of the former Minister of Finance who has successfully confused and misled a number of Ministers and back benchers in a deliberate effort to cause political instability as a strategy to achieve his own narrow political interests. However he may want to argue that he is not, he will not convince all right thinking Solomon Islanders who are sick and tired of watching national leaders serving themselves in the pretext of advancing national interests.

There is another concern and that is as national leaders, parliamentarians have a duty to protect this country from external control. I am raising this concern to remind this group of politicians of their stand on this matter when they were part of the government. The GCCG does not believe in compromising this interest.

Instability breeds foreign control especially when the resulting disaster is beyond the ability of the national law enforcement agencies to control. This is exactly what happened in year 2003 and now we are struggling to free ourselves from the oppressing effects of this control. National leaders must be reminded that we have a responsibility to protect the country. If we are not careful the present political standoff will lead to this development.

This is now going to the seventh day since the politicians concerned decided to revolt against my leadership and since then they have yet to provide any credible reasons for their actions except for what are clearly petty personal grudges against what they phrased “the prime minister’s leadership style” and allegations of personal involvements.

I was accused of pursuing a dictatorial leadership style by the defectors, adding that I did not consult Cabinet and Caucus on all major decisions regarding issues that concern our national interest. I am surprised that the group had the audacity to deliberately lie about this matter. I am not ignorant about the principles of Cabinet government system, which is premised on collective decision making process. I want to stand here and affirm my commitment to the principles of this governing system.

In fact I find it ironic that the defecting members of the GCCG can have the audacity to use this issue as the reason for their actions when the leader of the group the former Minister of Finance does not believe in it. For example, in total defiance of my directives to him he never consulted the cabinet on the issue of Solomon Airlines, which is now an embarrassment to the country.

He never consulted the Cabinet when he decided to use our revenue reserve to pay for our students’ fees in Papua New Guinea Institutions because that country withheld their assistance when the former Minister of Finance irresponsibly cancelled their 5th Freedom Right, without any consultations.
He failed to consult me despite my clear instructions to him that before any more purchases of government vehicles were made I must be fully consulted.

In defiance of this directive and the correct procedures governing the purchases of vehicles the former Minister of Finance and the former Minister of Infrastructure Development have committed SBD12.1million on the purchase of government vehicles so far this year. SBD2.8million of this amount is still owing to the suppliers.

My point here is that their concern for consultation must be fair. There must be one rule for every body. They cannot insist on it when it concerns others and simply forget it when it concerns them. This is hypocrisy in its blatant form and by continuing to hold this view the group is bringing disrepute upon itself.

I want to stand here and bravely say that I have yet to contravene this process because every major decision I took were endorsed by Cabinet. I must therefore refute this allegation against me as total lie, couched in personal hatred of the prime minister by the leader of the group who has yet to get over the way I took leadership of the GCCG soon after the fall of the Rini government.

He did not consult me, nor the Cabinet let alone breaching the correct procedures of financial management in the award of a number of contracts to his cronies.

By the same token I must also refute as totally rubbish the allegation that I listened more to political appointees than ministers. Of course I took notice of the advice by political appointees because they are engaged to perform specific roles for which they are entitled to brief the Prime Minister.

It would be wrong and totally false however to say that the Prime Minister listens to political advisors more than Ministers. There is a point beyond which advice by political appointees cannot and must not be entertained. It is the view of the political government that must be carried in the final analysis. I have yet to contravene this cardinal principle.

This argument may have stemmed from the allegation that it was the political appointees who advised the Prime Minister not to attend the PIF Leaders Summit in Tonga. This is pathetic as the people who advanced that allegation because it was cabinet that gave that mandate.

Interestingly, the very people who are now making this allegation were the very ones who were very vocal in cabinet when the matter was discussed, speaking in support of course. It would therefore be hypocritical of these individuals to insist that they were not part of Cabinet collective decision on that matter.

I was also accused of interfering with Ministers’ areas of responsibilities. I find it very difficult to understand the thinking behind this allegation. I must make it very clear that as the Prime Minister, I have the responsibility of ensuring that Ministers exercise their responsibilities professionally and within the bounds of government policy, administrative procedures and the rule of law.

It would be irresponsible of me to allow Ministers to have their own way or allow their feelings to influence their decisions. Likewise, it is the role of the Prime Minister to ensure that ministers who are charged with portfolio subjects act professionally, and discharge their duties without fear or favour in the exercise of statutory powers. If what the resigned ministers wanted was to have a free hand, then they are deluding themselves.

This begs the question, what than is the role of the Prime Minister if he must not intervene when the conduct of his Ministers in the exercise of statutory or administrative powers is viewed by members of the public as lacking professionalism or clearly borders on unlawfulness and out of procedures?
Examples of these are the decision by the former Minister of Finance to award a $3.8 million contract to clean up Gizo town to a person very close to him without going through the proper tender requirements; or the granting of a $5.9million contract to a particular local Computer firm for the supply of computers to secondary schools again, without going through the proper tender requirements.

A more serious deal was made between the former Minister of Finance and a particular former Minister for the supply of building materials for the Tsunami rehabilitation project. SBD7million of this amount has been paid the former Minister of Finance without going through the proper tender requirements I am aware that this deal is bothering the former Minister of concern.

Now don’t get me wrong, I am all for assisting local businesses and great advocate of government spending as an important macroeconomic policy tool to boost economic activities that would lead to economic growth and I can associate with the argument posed by the former Minister of Finance and Treasury in this regard.

The issue here however, is not the employment of this macroeconomic policy tool, which was strongly argued by the former Minister, rather the need to comply with the requirements of the Financial Instructions as regard tender requirements and the Public Finance & Audit Act in the disbursement and accounting for public funds. This is in the interest of transparency, accountability and responsibility in the management of the budget.

The new Minister of Finance has been tasked to investigate the status of government finance and will report on it in due course.

The former Minister of Fisheries and Marine Resources Development was not happy about my intervention in his ministry when I insisted that the renewal of access licenses including the related fees for foreign tuna fishing vessels be reviewed by Cabinet in light of the change in government policy, favoring more onshore processing establishments by the various associations.

The reason for my concern was that for years Solomon Islands has been earning a lousy $48million per annum in license fees from the exploitation of our tuna resources by foreign fishing vessels, when we should be earning to the tune of SBD3billion per annum if we encouraged more onshore processing establishments. The renewal of the licenses would have been a perfect opportunity to put forward that condition.
I also insisted that the composition of the delegation to negotiate the renewal of the fishing agreement must include representatives from the Prime Minister’s Office, Planning and Finance. This is because previous experiences have shown that a single ministry delegation is vulnerable to undue pressure during these negotiations. I fail to see any thing wrong with this directive, which was made in the best interest of maximizing the benefits that the country should get from our tuna resources.

The Minister was obviously insulted by this directive and took it as interference in his Ministry. What Ministers need to appreciate is that they are not an island of their own. They are part of a team that supports a line of political thinking in the way development is to be addressed.

The former Minister of Fisheries also alleged that the government is not serious about addressing the bona-fide demands of the people of Guadalcanal. I find this allegation very insulting. For the information of the public, the development strategies adopted by the GCCG is developed to provide answers to the question, why did the country collapsed in year 2000?

This placed the GCCG as a government that considers addressing the issues that caused the ethnic crisis as central to achieving peace and long term stability as part and parcel of its development strategies. I can only repeat what I told the people of Guadalcanal during their 2nd Appointed Day Celebrations.

That:

On state government, A Draft Federal Constitution has been done and it is currently systematically going through a vigorous scrutiny by local experts and overseas constitutional experts. The recently announced Constitutional Congress is part of this process.

It is our commitment to ensure that the Draft Federal Constitution is submitted to Cabinet in October 2008. The Cabinet will deal with it in the normal way through the Cabinet processes and then submit the Final Draft Federal Constitution of Solomon Islands for consideration and debate by Parliament. It needs to be appreciated here that Parliament at this final stage will merely endorse what has been agreed to by the Convention.

I want to assure the people of Guadalcanal and the country that the GCCG is fully committed to implement the new Federal system during our term in office.

The call for fair distribution of economic benefits from the utilization of resources is built into the very structure of the new Federal Constitution, especially in the revenue sharing provisions. Also carried in the new constitution is the protection of resources against unscrupulous members of the tribe who without the consent of all members of the tribe give away rights for the exploitation of tribal resources. This will no longer be possible under the new Federal Constitution where the consent of all tribal members must be obtained before resources are allowed for development.

The government’s bottom-up approach to development is also a strategy to ensure that our people benefit from the utilization of our resources. In this connection, Key development ministries including Fisheries, Forestry, Mining, Agriculture, Commerce, and Tourism are tasked with the responsibility to continue to develop strategies under the new approach to ensure that our people benefit from their resources.

In deed, the GPPOL and Gold Ridge landowners’ participation arrangement is a perfect example of the strategy to ensure that land and resource owners fully benefit in the investment through their participation. The government is also working on a legal framework to allow the original landowners of crown land that cannot be returned for strategic reasons to be appropriately compensated.

On the call for the distribution of major development to other provinces, the government fully recognized the fact that investors can only be attracted to locations outside of Honiara if there are adequate basic infrastructures including reliable market connections. We need to be strategic in our approach in addressing this issue. Since our strength lies in our natural resources, we intend to focus on that strength.

Fisheries and Agriculture are leading the way in this strategy. In agriculture, a number of sites have been identified for large - scale oil palm development on Malaita and Choiseul provinces. The government also sees the huge potential that tourism has in our provinces and we are working on developing that potential under the bottom-up approach.

The Ministry of Fishery in conjunction with some investors have carried out feasibility studies on the suitable locations outside of Honiara to set up additional on shore processing base to process our tuna, and I am very encouraged with the preliminary findings with three locations identified.

To provide an added comfort to major developers to invest in locations outside of Honiara, the government will be introducing in Parliament a Special Economic Zone Legislation in the next sitting. Under this legislation, the minister responsible will be empowered to declare certain locations in the country Special Economic Zones with special treatment for investors who invest in these zones.

On the call for the recognition of our land tenure system, the government is working on a comprehensive land reform program, which will fully recognize the land tenure system of all provinces in determining the question of ownership and usage of land. The effecting legislation will be introduced to Parliament in its next sitting. The reform will also address the problem of land disputes, which has become a major stumbling block to development.

On the call for the return of alienated land to customary owners, the government is working on an implementation strategy that will ensure that the land so returned must be available for development. The government is fully aware of the call by the people of Guadalcanal for the return of Russell Islands Property Enterprises Limited or Lunga Land, the Mamara/Tasivarongo land; Mavo land; Ruaniu; Lavuro, and Brewer Solomon Associates Limited land at Metapono and will be working very closely with the right people to address this demand.

The smooth implementation of the policy on the return of alienated land needs the full cooperation and assistance of people who have interest in these lands to sort out the question of genuine indigenous ownership of these parcels of land. This appears to be the difficult aspect of the implementation and we call on the full cooperation of the people concerned.
On another development, Cabinet has approved the establishment of Tandai Land Trust Board as a strategy to effectively address the concerns of the original landowners of Honiara land. As intimated earlier, the Attorney General’s Office has been tasked to come up with a legislative framework which will address the issue of financial benefit to the original landowners of Honiara and other crown land where, because of their strategic nature, excluded from the policy to return them to the original landowners.

This policy will ensure that the living members of the original owners and their descendents will be entitled to a permanent monetary compensation for the use by the state of their land. The Honiara land is a case in point.

While on land, I am also pleased to announce that the work on the establishment of the Commission of Inquiry into land dealings on Guadalcanal as required under the Townsville Peace Agreement (TPA) is progressing very well. As soon as its Terms of Reference are finalized we should be able to appoint Commissioners to begin the inquiry.

This is a very sensitive area, which must be handled with great care and tact and therefore the understanding of all affected parties is required. Thousands of Solomon Islanders were forced to abandon their properties, which may involve huge claims of compensation. The government is fully aware of this eventuality and is determined with the guidance of the Attorney General to assist our people. For the purpose of addressing the issue of compensation, the government will establish a Compensation Commission under the Constitution.
On the call for the respect of culture and customs, and in particular the call that only indigenous people must have the right to contest for political office, the government appreciates that they strike directly at the heart of the concern that only the indigenous people are placed in a position to understand the minds and cries of indigenous Solomon Islanders, and transcends economic needs.

We believe that this is an issue that cannot be bought by promises of thousands of dollars and actual delivery of election promises by the non-indigenous Solomon Islands citizens who win seats in Parliament or Provincial Assemblies on the strength of their economic positions.

Rather, it is concerned with indigenous ownership of Solomon Islands politics and political decisions. Any other brands of Solomon Islanders are guests in this country.

The Government shared the belief that, that area remains the privy of indigenous knowledge and experience. The three years of ethnic conflict will stand as a perpetual reminder to the seriousness of this concern.

The responsibility for the realization of the objectives of this demand rests squarely on the shoulders of each and every voting population of Guadalcanal. The government is not in the business of determining who comes to Parliament or Provincial Assemblies. To be honest, we are yet to see the seriousness of the people of Guadalcanal in this matter.

On the call for the government to ensure that the safety and security of our people are guaranteed, we are committed during the development and rehabilitation phase of the Royal Solomon Islands Police Force to continue to work very closely with the Regional Assistance Mission to Solomon Islands.
In this regard, I want to once again reassure the people of Guadalcanal, that the government will not do anything that will undermine the safety and security of our people in its dealings with RAMSI. This is basically reiterating the many public statements we made on this matter, however negative they may sound. The concern of the government is that since RAMSI has become a very important part of our lives, it is important that it is premised on the principles of mutual respect and understanding.

But as mentioned earlier, as a country we have a duty to ensure that our own security and police force are competent to handle our internal security, for the simple reason that the regional initiative is not permanent. This is where we need the full and unreserved understanding and cooperation of our people on the strategies implemented by the government to achieve this objective.

Based on these analyses, I can find no reason to justify the moves taken by the defectors and the call for my resignation. Instead what comes out forcefully from these analyses is that the defectors have become innocent victims of the desire by the ring leaders who have personal grudges against the prime minister to achieve their narrow selfish political interest that have nothing to do with the interest of the country.
This is clearly demonstrated in the 9- point defamatory statement issued by the opposition office. Which I feel obliged to respond to now as follows:-

 The opposition group deliberately and with malicious intentions alleged that I was involved in the planning of the 2000 coup.

I swear before the almighty God that I have nothing to do with the planning of the 2000 coup or even have any knowledge of it ever happening until the morning of 5th June 2000 when the streets were taken over by the militants.

 The opposition deliberately and with malicious intentions alleged that I employed my cronies and relatives in the prime ministers office. I must categorically refute this allegation as misinformation. Political appointments in the prime minister’s office are made on party lines because we are a coalition. The Director General is SOCRED Party’s contribution to the pool of political appointees and is qualified.

 The opposition deliberately and with malicious intentions continued to issue false statements about the prime minister’s housing deal. As explained, the property was acquired from a loan obtained from the ANZ bank, fully secured by our private assets. There was no private dealing with the Republic of China except that they are willing to enter into a long term tenancy agreement with us. There is nothing wrong with it, and I do not see any were in this deal that I compromise my position as the prime Minister of Solomon Islands.

 The opposition deliberately and with malicious intentions alleged that I am anti-RAMSI. If the opposition cared to listen and understand, it is never the intention of the government under my leadership to chase RAMSI out of Solomon Islands. In fact they can stay in the country as long as the people of Solomon Islands need them. All that we are concerned about is the legal framework, which needs to be restructured to reflect the changing situations since their arrival in 2003. Parliament has overwhelmingly approved the government’s intention. We are fully committed in this review to work very closely with the processes approved by the leaders in the 37th PIF Leaders meeting in Nadi.

 The opposition deliberately and with malicious intentions continued to make misleading statements about the Attorney General and his relationship with the Prime Minister. We have exhausted all legal and administrative explanation on this matter and if the opposition and the very few so-called campaigners of good governance cannot see the light in this matter, than there is nothing I or any one could do to enlightened them. This matter is now in the hands of Mr. Moti’s lawyers and it is best we allow them to handle it with the Government of Australia.

 The opposition group deliberately and with malicious intentions disclosed confidential cabinet conclusions on the issue of the 666 questions. It is Cabinet’s decision to incur public fund to pay for the cost of preparing the 666 questions and therefore fully satisfies the principles of transparency, accountability and responsibility. There is nothing administratively or legally wrong with this policy decision.

 The opposition group deliberately and with malicious intentions alleged that the $300,000 paid to Hon Charles Dausabea was obtained illegally or with the influence of the Prime Minister. The amount was paid to Hon Charles Dausabea on application to complete his Motel to accommodate Ministers and visiting guests to the 29th Anniversary Independence Celebrations in Auki. This payment was no different to the payment made to the owner of Kiakoe resort on Lake Tegano to host the Premiers’ Conference. In fact Hon Charles Dausabea allowed the Government free accommodation during the celebrations. The amount was properly applied for by Hon Dausabea as a project assistance from the Ministry of Commerce.

 The opposition group deliberately and with malicious intentions alleged that the Prime Minister was involved in the payment of $399,000 to Pacific Travel Center for the South Pacific Games. I must categorically refute this defamatory statement as a complete lie. I have nothing to do with the payment neither have I any knowledge of the payment nor involved in the arrangement to cash it as alleged in the statement. I am insulted by this lie and will seek legal advice on it.

 The opposition group deliberately and with malicious intentions personally attacked my person and branded me as a paranoid. If the opposition is referring to the tough decisions I took on behalf of the government to protect the sovereignty of this country than that’s their problem. I am proud to be a Solomon Islander and will continue to defend this country against forces that are determined to divide this country. The present political problem is one such strategy of these evil forces. I have nothing to hide. My mind is clear. The battle belongs to God and I am confident that he will take us through as he always did in the past. This political battle will be won on truth and justice not telling lies and the making of defamatory statements. I will remain His faithful servant and the service of our people until He decides in his own time to take me down. I would like to assure the people of Solomon Islands that the government is still in control and we are confident to resolve this matter in the next few days.

God Bless Solomon Islands.

posted by administrator @ 8:07 AM  
1 Comments:
  • At 9:33 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    2. [url=http://www.mulberryhandbagssale.co.uk]mulberry outlet[/url Spending your vacation in Miami is not always fun and really memorable especially if you booked for your stay in the city does not fit with your living standards. [url=http://www.goosecoatsale.ca]canada goose down coat[/url] Ttnbbkaao
    [url=http://www.pandorajewelryvip.co.uk]pandora Sale[/url] Ouguboycb [url=http://www.officialcanadagooseparkae.com]canada goose outlet toronto[/url] gjeqpazkb

     
Post a Comment
<< Home
 
  • NAVIGATIONAL LINKS

    SCHOLARSHIP SITES AND EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES
    INTERNATIONAL NEWS
    LOCAL AND REGIONAL NEWS
    OTHER SOLOMON LINKS
    SPORTS LINKS
    TOK STORI - ALA'ANGA DISCUSSION FORUM
    PHOTOS
    Regional Bodies
    Research Papers and Articles
    CENTRAL MALAITA STUDENTS
    • 1. ABA, Alan
    • 2. ADIFAKA, Margaret
    • 3. AFIA, Kabini
    • 4. ANII, Dennis
    • 5. ANII, Loretta
    • 6. ATOA, Betty
    • 7. BARE, Gavin
    • 8. BATALOFO, Margaret
    • 9. BIBIASI, Joseph
    • 10. BISAFO, Samson
    • 11. BUGA, Benjamin
    • 12. BUKA, Glen
    • 13. BUNABO, Steven
    • 14. ENOCH, Derick
    • 15. ETUA, Dennis
    • 16. FARADATOLO, David
    • 17. FUGUI, Dudley
    • 18. GALASAU, Noel
    • 19. GERENIU, Collin
    • 20. GULIOA, George
    • 21. IKA, Silas Phillip
    • 22. HUNUEHU, Helen
    • 23. IDU, Francis
    • 24. KAO, George
    • 25. KETEI, Allan
    • 26. KINIOU, Aaron
    • 27. KWALU, Jerry
    • 28. KWATOO, Tony
    • 29. LUITOLO, Steven
    • 30. MAEKWARE,Tom
    • 31. MANATE'E, Wesley
    • 32. MANUSALO, Nelly
    • 33. MISIBINI, ALick
    • 34. MISIBINI, William
    • 35. MISITE'E, John
    • 36. OTTO, Steven Jude
    • 37. RAU, Ishmael
    • 38. SALEMANU, Martin
    • 39. SIARANI, ANDY
    • 40. SUABULU, Gray
    • 41. TEGEROBO, Moses
    • 42. TOITO'ONA, Joan
    • 43. TORILOFA, Frank
    • 44. UGULU, Primo
    • 45. VAJAH, Jimmy

    • USP STAFFS AND FRIENDS
    • 1. MAE, Paul
    • 2. BUTAFA, Emanuel
    CURRENCY CONVERTOR
    ARCHIVES
    Archives
    GREATEST HITS FROM SOLOMONS ISLANDS (1960s-1980s)

    Free Blogger Templates

    BLOGGER